On Sept. 22, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, and Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, wrote to Mr. Rutledge requesting a delay and an explanation of the rationale behind the proposed reorganization.
"The proposed reorganization appears to be a meaningful structural change from the status quo, shifting authorities to EBSA's politically appointed deputy and creating a new director position to oversee regional offices," Ms. Murray and Mr. Scott wrote in their letter. "We have questions about the need and basis for this proposed reorganization and whether EBSA's vital mission will be impaired. As such, we write to respectfully recommend that you delay the proposed reorganization until Congress and interested stakeholders fully understand the rationale and ramifications of this proposed reorganization for the millions of workers, retirees and families EBSA serves."
Currently, Jeanne Klinefelter Wilson, EBSA's principal deputy assistant secretary since May, is the political appointee, initially appointed deputy assistant secretary for policy in November 2017. Timothy D. Hauser, a career staffer, serves as deputy assistant secretary for program operations, a position he's held since 2013.
If there is no delay, effective Oct. 1 Ms. Wilson will oversee the office of exemption determinations and the office of regulations and interpretations. Mr. Hauser will oversee the office of enforcement, the office of technology and information services, and the office of outreach, education and assistance, according to the Groom brief.
Ms. Wilson will keep her title while Mr. Hauser will become deputy assistant secretary for the national office, according to the Labor Department spokesman. The new deputy assistant secretary. was not identified.
Erin M. Sweeney, a Washington-based member of Miller & Chevalier Chartered's ERISA and fiduciary litigation practice, said the concept behind the proposed reorganization is to allow EBSA to be more nimble.
"When the president issues an executive order and the amount of time that it takes for the Department of Labor to be responsive and get guidance projects out has been extremely frustrating to the administration," she said.
The congressional members sent a list of 11 questions for Mr. Rutledge to answer, including, "What problem is this proposed reorganization designed to solve?" and "What specifically prompted this proposed reorganization and when did formal or informal planning for the proposed reorganization begin?"
The lawmakers requested a response by Sept. 30.
"When responsibilities are shuffled between Senate-approved officials and career employees, there's a natural tendency to wonder whether the reorganization is advancing a political objective," Mr. Netter said. "The Democrats who have engaged on this are the Democrats with primary oversight responsibility over DOL. They want to understand the rationale for the reorganization before it's implemented."